Housing

Stop Wall Street, Protect Your Home.

Institutional investors have been quietly buying single-family homes in Madison County and renting them back to families who used to own. The price of buying a home is the price of the family who already wants one — plus the offer from a fund that doesn't live here.

The mechanism

The fund competing with you isn't a family.

A first-time buyer in Hazel Green, Meridianville, or Five Points is no longer competing with another family. They're competing with a private equity fund that pays cash, waives inspection, and closes in seven days. That fund doesn't lose if the offer is too high — they convert the home into a rental and earn the spread in perpetuity.

The cumulative effect on a market like ours is direct. Inventory shifts from owned to rented. Rents rise because the same fund holds the supply. Property taxes get pushed onto homeowners who remain. And the wealth-building engine of a starter home — the single most reliable on-ramp to middle-class stability in this country — closes for the next family before they reach it.

Who pays

  • First-time buyers — priced out by all-cash institutional offers
  • Renters — facing rent increases as a single landlord controls more of the local supply
  • Existing homeowners — paying tax burdens on an inflated market while watching their neighborhoods change tenant-by-tenant
  • Communities — losing the stability that owner-occupancy historically provides

What we're building

  1. A purchase-price disclosure rule for buyers organized as institutional entities, so Madison County families can see in real time how much of the local market is being absorbed.
  2. A first-time-buyer right of first refusal on listings in qualifying price ranges — a 72-hour window before institutional offers can be accepted.
  3. Local housing trust seed funding that converts a fraction of state ARPA-style infrastructure dollars into down-payment assistance for buyers under area median income.

Whether by passing legislation or organizing the community, these next four years progress will be made one way or another.

The platform

Build It Right. Stand Behind It.

Alabama law doesn't require residential builders to provide a written warranty. Doesn't require liability insurance. Doesn't codify a statutory implied warranty of good and workmanlike construction. Buyers absorb the cost of defects through years-long disputes with no statutory floor. Build It Right combines worker safety and buyer protection into one bill — what every other regulated trade in Alabama already does.

1-2-6 Statutory Warranty Floor

1 year on workmanship and materials. The cosmetic and basic-functional layer of the house. Paint, doors that latch, drywall cracks, cabinets, tile grout, finish carpentry. If something in this category fails in the first year, the builder is required to fix it.

2 years on plumbing, electrical, heating, and air-conditioning. The mechanical systems. Sewer laterals, fixture supply lines, electrical rough-ins, HVAC ductwork and equipment. The first sewage backup, the failed compressor, the unsealed ductwork — all covered for two years from closing.

6 years on major structural components. Foundation, load-bearing walls, framing that transfers roof load to the foundation, roof structure itself. The slow-revealing defects that take years to show — settling cracks, framing errors that break load paths, foundation movement. Six years to bring a claim.

Mandatory Liability Insurance

A license to operate as a residential builder in Alabama becomes tied to active, current liability insurance. Specific minimums are written into law: $1 million per occurrence, $2 million aggregate, with explicit completed-operations coverage. The certificate of insurance is filed with the Alabama Home Builders Licensure Board. A lapse in coverage triggers automatic license suspension.

Statutory Implied Warranty of Good and Workmanlike Construction

A legislative codification of the standard, not subject to ordinary contractual disclaimer. The default applies in every residential contract. A waiver requires more than boilerplate — explicit, conspicuous language supported by separate consideration. The buyer arrives at closing with a baseline of legally enforceable workmanship standards, regardless of what the builder's contract says.

In litigation, the buyer's case becomes simpler. Instead of proving the builder violated specific contract language — often vague or absent — the buyer proves the work fell below the standard of a reasonably competent practitioner. Industry experts testify on what the standard is. The judge or jury applies it to the facts. Either the work met the trade's own bar or it didn't.