The platform
Build It Right. Stand Behind It.
Alabama law doesn't require residential builders to provide a written warranty. Doesn't require liability insurance. Doesn't codify a statutory implied warranty of good and workmanlike construction. Buyers absorb the cost of defects through years-long disputes with no statutory floor. Build It Right combines worker safety and buyer protection into one bill — what every other regulated trade in Alabama already does.
1-2-6 Statutory Warranty Floor
1 year on workmanship and materials. The cosmetic and basic-functional layer of the house. Paint, doors that latch, drywall cracks, cabinets, tile grout, finish carpentry. If something in this category fails in the first year, the builder is required to fix it.
2 years on plumbing, electrical, heating, and air-conditioning. The mechanical systems. Sewer laterals, fixture supply lines, electrical rough-ins, HVAC ductwork and equipment. The first sewage backup, the failed compressor, the unsealed ductwork — all covered for two years from closing.
6 years on major structural components. Foundation, load-bearing walls, framing that transfers roof load to the foundation, roof structure itself. The slow-revealing defects that take years to show — settling cracks, framing errors that break load paths, foundation movement. Six years to bring a claim.
Mandatory Liability Insurance
A license to operate as a residential builder in Alabama becomes tied to active, current liability insurance. Specific minimums are written into law: $1 million per occurrence, $2 million aggregate, with explicit completed-operations coverage. The certificate of insurance is filed with the Alabama Home Builders Licensure Board. A lapse in coverage triggers automatic license suspension.
Statutory Implied Warranty of Good and Workmanlike Construction
A legislative codification of the standard, not subject to ordinary contractual disclaimer. The default applies in every residential contract. A waiver requires more than boilerplate — explicit, conspicuous language supported by separate consideration. The buyer arrives at closing with a baseline of legally enforceable workmanship standards, regardless of what the builder's contract says.
In litigation, the buyer's case becomes simpler. Instead of proving the builder violated specific contract language — often vague or absent — the buyer proves the work fell below the standard of a reasonably competent practitioner. Industry experts testify on what the standard is. The judge or jury applies it to the facts. Either the work met the trade's own bar or it didn't.